Skip to main content

Predicting the 53-Man Roster Proves Difficult

After a meaningless game in which no starters played, we escaped without injury and McFadden showcased his strength and downhill style a little more.

The biggest question is, who makes the 53 man roster? Of course several players still could be on the bubble if we bring in guys that were cut from other teams, but which 53 are we looking at right now? Consider this...its not Lane's decision. Al Davis calls the shots, but I would expect Davis to listen to the coach on the offense, the defense is going to be heavily influenced by Davis. Still, although I'll be only 90% correct, here is my guesses and why.

QB: Russell, Walter, Tui - Kiffin already said we will carry three QBs

RB: Fargas, McFadden, Bush - Rankin is eligible for the practice squad, and we don't need him unless we have an injury.

FB: Griffith, Lawton - There is a hunch I have that Reece makes it over Lawton, but considering Reece could go to the practice squad, I have to guess this way. There is a chance Lawton goes if a good blocking FB gets cuts from another team.

WR: Walker, Curry, Higgins, Watkins, Schilens, Shields, - Considering health and ceiling I think it starts this way, although I think a WR could be brought in either from other teams cuts or via a veteran after the season starts (So his salary wouldn't be guaranteed). Shields would be the first to go, but we will have time to look at him healthy while we look for other options.

TE: Miller, Madsen - I think we will go with just two TE as Fred Wakefield could fill in blocking on the goal line.

OL: Gallery, Harris, Henderson, Green, McQuistan, Wade, Grove, Morris, Wakefield - Although there is an outside chance the Henderson experiment is over, I don't think it is this year unless a decent OT becomes available. Wakefield's versatility will keep him around, even with so many guards on the team. Wade makes it simply because Grove's injury can't be trusted. I actually think Wade gets cut, but who makes it instead?

Offensive Total: 25

ST: Lechler, Seabass, Condo - No surprises here.

Special Teams Total: 3

DT: Kelly, Warren, Sands, Joseph - Joseph makes it because Al Davis liked him coming out of college.

DE: Burgess, Richardson, Scott, Edwards - I really like Scott and I think the coaches have seen enough to think he can be a viable option when needed. Edwards tries to fill the pass-rush role, but chances are Richardson has to step up, and I think he will.

LB: Howard, Morrison, Brown, Thomas, Alston, Ekejuiba, Williams - Seven LBs is deceiving, but we keep them because two are going to play largely special team roles and probably don't have much value as backups. Special teams was a problem last year and more guys will be kept to help that area. Sam Williams continues his scholarship. I would expect plenty of the bottom four to be inactive at times this season.

CB: Asomugha, Hall, Routt, Johnson - I think this is pretty locked up, I guess we could keep an extra player, but you have to consider most undrafted rookies will be practice squad eligible.

S: Huff, Wilson, Branch, Underwood, Eugene, Baker - I wanted to cut Eugene and Baker, but considering we need the depth and the other guys are pretty much rookies, both could be cut without hesitation, I just had a hard time finding enough players that deserved to make the roster actually make the roster. I like Underwood as a dark horse to make the team.

Defensive Total: 25

Total: 53

I was pretty unhappy with the roster overall, just because at most positions it wasn't as if there was a clear cut winner at the end of the rotation. As I've said before, we really lack depth on this team and it show when you have to determine who makes the team like this.

I would also guess we make a minimum of three roster moves before the season starts to shore up some positions and even out the positional numbers.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Oakland Raiders Swing for the Fences in 2016 NFL Draft

[embed align="center"]http://gty.im/153039819[/embed] These aren't your daddy's Oakland Raiders or even your younger self's Raiders. If anything, these are your newborn's Raiders or your puppy's Raiders. These are the Raiders we've never seen before. Indicative of the freshness of the franchise was their 2016 NFL Draft. No longer slave to a high draft pick and desperate needs, the theme of the draft for the Raiders was upside. It's as if general manager Reggie McKenzie got so used to hitting his draft picks out of the park that he started swinging for the fences. We'll have to wait a couple of years before we know if he struck out or if he'll continue his Ruthian ways. First, McKenzie boldly went with a safety at No. 14 overall. Kyle Joseph is coming off a torn ACL and fills a major need, but safety isn't a premium position. Only a handful of safeties have been drafted in the first 14 picks in the last 15 years and include names like Ea...

Oakland Raiders' Studs and Duds From Preseason Week 1

[embed]http://gty.im/484069738[/embed] The Oakland Raiders finally look like a competitive football team again. That should be the biggest takeaway from their preseason rout of the St. Louis Rams. Quarterback Derek Carr and the offense looked significantly improved from a year ago, thanks in large part to some of the studs listed below. The starting defense was still a little shaky, but there were still a few bright spots. Overall, the Raiders can feel good about their first live action of the year, especially since there appeared to be no significant injuries to come out of it. Studs Rodney Hudson Of all general manager Reggie McKenzie's offseason acquisitions, he committed the most money to center Rodney Hudson. Offensive linemen rarely get the praise they deserve, but a great offensive line as anchored in the middle can be huge for an offense. Hudson was very solid in his debut against a very good defensive front. If Hudson and the offensive line can consistently protect Carr an...

The Raiders aren't who we thought they were....they're better

The Oakland Raiders are tired of being the team that will be good in a year or two. The team expects to win now and it is winning now. We thought the Raiders needed more talent. We thought that being in the playoff hunt was a year away for this team, but we were wrong. This isn't the team we thought they were, they're better. On Sunday, they moved to 3-3 on Sunday with a 37-29 win over the San Diego Chargers that wasn't close until the final minute. It was also the Raiders second road win of the season. The last time the Raiders had two road wins by their sixth game was 2011. Before that, a five-year streak from 1998-2002. The Raiders went 8-8 in 1998, 1999 and 2011 and narrowly missed the playoffs each year.  They made the playoffs in 2000, 2001 and 2002. They didn't have a losing record in any of those seasons because teams that can win on the road are usually pretty good. As the season matures, there is more and more evidence that some of the "best-case scenario...