Snow Job Revenge?

Richard Seymour has been sent the five-day letter & if he doesn’t report by Tuesday the Raiders can put him on left club list and he is done for 2009. His final contract year will be pushed to 2010.

Provided the Raiders put Seymour on this list, his rights remain with the Raiders next season.

However, the trade with the Patriots still hinges on him reporting AND passing his physical.

So theoretically the Raiders could invalidate the trade one year from now if Seymour fails said physical.

Seymour would lose his year for not reporting and Pats would be forced to take a 31-year-old Seymour back along with the final year of hisdeal.

This is not likely, but an interesting gray area that is within the CBA rules.

Because of this unlikey but possible scenerio the NFL really needs to step in and clarify the issue, even if the CBA affords no clarity.

Leave it to the Raiders to prompt a future rule/CBA change.

Seymour isn’t making friends in the locker room and I’ve talked to plenty of Raiders fans that would rather he not be on the team.

I’d be likely to agree with them if we didn’t need his services so badly along the defensive line.

Posted in Uncategorized Tagged with:


  • Bad comparison. That's mental preparedness thing. Level of comp debate older than game itself. I do not subscribe.
    about 6 hours ago
  • @RaiderBeat Always a projection from college to pros. Always.
    about 13 hours ago
  • Hayden doesn't look much like he did in college. I feel like most of his issues are between the ears. Important factor, but strange deal.
    about 14 hours ago
  • Not if you watched his college tape. How would you even know a "reach" when you saw it? BS narrative.
    about 14 hours ago
  • Raiders vs. Chiefs x2 going to be big factor in wildcard race one way or another.
    about 14 hours ago