The Pros and Cons of Michael Vick

Michael Vick was released today. Is he a fit in Oakland? I outline the pro and cons.

Pros:
-He is still a physical freak
-He can run the wildcat
-He is versatile
-He has nice arm strength
-He can be had for cheap
-Raiders don’t mind the PR circus

Cons:
-The collection of PETA members in the bay area will swarm the training facility.
-He may have lost a step or two
-He isn’t an accurate QB
-We don’t need another person to run the wildcat because we have McFadden and Bush
-He is a PR nightmare
-You might alienate a small part of your ticket buying fan base by signing him.

Conclusion:
I don’t think he is a good fit, not because of the off-the-field issues, but more because of the on-the-field ones. He just doesn’t have a place. Not even at backup QB. I do think he could make an impact on a team with a statue QB looking for someone to run the wildcat. The west coast would certainly be more favorable because the media circus would only last for a short time before the media were sent back home to the east coast. the down-side of that would be more of the fan-base would likely be pro animal rights. The Cowboys makes a lot of sense for a whole lot of reasons.

Posted in Uncategorized Tagged with:

Twitter

  • So...Brock Osweiler. QB of future or not? I get why Elway picked a QB, but was expensive hedge. I don't get that or Brock > Wilson.
    about 22 mins ago
  • @bronctastic Of course. I said it wasn't his best pick. It's actually one of his worst. That's the fact jack.
    about 25 mins ago
  • @bronctastic 1) I cover the whole NFL. 2) Criticism that's merited is merited regardless of if someone else also merits it.
    about 28 mins ago
  • @Slampage1212 I do.
    about 30 mins ago
  • Perception thing, but also scouting community was much higher on Ray than Ford, I believe. https://t.co/PllHwqBTCC
    about 30 mins ago