The Pros and Cons of Michael Vick

Michael Vick was released today. Is he a fit in Oakland? I outline the pro and cons.

Pros:
-He is still a physical freak
-He can run the wildcat
-He is versatile
-He has nice arm strength
-He can be had for cheap
-Raiders don’t mind the PR circus

Cons:
-The collection of PETA members in the bay area will swarm the training facility.
-He may have lost a step or two
-He isn’t an accurate QB
-We don’t need another person to run the wildcat because we have McFadden and Bush
-He is a PR nightmare
-You might alienate a small part of your ticket buying fan base by signing him.

Conclusion:
I don’t think he is a good fit, not because of the off-the-field issues, but more because of the on-the-field ones. He just doesn’t have a place. Not even at backup QB. I do think he could make an impact on a team with a statue QB looking for someone to run the wildcat. The west coast would certainly be more favorable because the media circus would only last for a short time before the media were sent back home to the east coast. the down-side of that would be more of the fan-base would likely be pro animal rights. The Cowboys makes a lot of sense for a whole lot of reasons.

Tagged with:
Posted in Uncategorized

Twitter

  • Unfortunately, yes. Although "full" is subject to interpretation. RT @Boinkity_Boink: are you using the word "literally" correctly here? :)
    about 2 hours ago
  • My timeline is literally full of rainbows right now.
    about 2 hours ago
  • @SullyFootball How much should the Chiefs pay Alex Smith?
    about 2 hours ago
  • Yeah, but ESPN 2's defense is suspect. RT @DylanMacNamara: Pat White just scored a touchdown on ESPN 2.
    about 2 hours ago
  • RT @SI_PeterKing: RT @kcflatlander: Sign Alex Smith or wait? ... If $16m or less, sign. If now, wait.
    about 2 hours ago